Saturday, November 6, 2010

Let it Flow: For Marlo-With Love





Just when I had pretty much accepted the fact that the fall season on Broadway was going to be a complete and utter disappointment, I saw something that lit a spark of optimism in my heart.

Last night, along with fellow graduates of Brown University, I was invited to a performance of the new emo/rock musical Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson, followed by a talk with one of the show's producers, Oskar Eustis. Eustis, who looks a bit like Paul Bunyon with a beard and a mop of brown hair, is the artistic director of the Public Theater where the production of this show began its life. The genesis of the idea to put the life and political career of the 7th President of the United States to an emo/rock score apparently involved a playwright and a composer with completely different theatrical agendas: one was fascinated by a course in which he studied Andrew Jackson, and one just wanted to do something related to emo kids and their subculture. The result, as my friend pointed out, is a "reese's pieces" of a musical and it totally works.

Part of the reason it works is that it treats American politics of the 19th century with the same irreverence that South Park treats Oprah Winfrey and her private parts: nothing is sacred. Jackson, played superbly by the Julliard-trained young actor Benjamin Walker, is a gun-toting, tight jean and eye liner wearing loose canon, who throws chairs when he doesn't get what he wants and sings about how life "sucks" when his parents are killed by Indians. He also spills a lot of blood and not just when he conquers the Spaniards, the British and the Seminoles in Florida. He and his true love Rachel like to cut themselves when they are happily in love and also when they despair. The fact that the audience laughs and cringes at the same time pretty much sums up the overall tone of the show.

Walker, as Jackson, is such a commanding stage presence that he masters the appeal of America's first populist president, whose dubious claim to fame is how he solved the "Indian Problem" by forcing the Indians to keep moving further West until there was nowhere left to go (but onto reservations.) As serious as the issues are that Jackson faces when he finally becomes President in 1829 (after being robbed of the Presidency the first time around in a conspiracy of the Bush/Gore variety) the show continues to mine his political and personal relationships for their humor and resonance with contemporary political shenanigans. Jackson is the "people's president," but when he gets into office he finds that the populace doesn't know what the hell they want. And he sings "it's impossible to get anything done in Washington." That tune sounds so familiar.

It doesn't take long to get the feel for the bizarre juxtaposition of history and popular culture that is this superb production. The set designers have turned the entire Jacobs theater into a combination Victorian-Goth fun house, complete with blood red walls, a stuffed horse hanging upside down over the audience, numerous chandeliers, and at least two electric guitar players on stage at all times. The music and lyrics are loud, brash and a lot of fun. Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson may just be the only bloody good thing in the fall theater season.


Monday, October 18, 2010

Correction: ZuckerBERG


Given that one cannot escape the name Mark Zuckerberg these days (it appeared in the conclusion of an article in The New York Times "Week in Review" section just yesterday, and in today's interview with actor Armie Hammer in nymetro), I felt it my duty to issue a correction: the "berg" in Zuckerberg is "erg" not "urg."

I spelled it wrong in my discussion of The Social Network in last night's post. Since the god of Facebook seems to see all and know all, I just wanted to make sure he didn't see my post and let it be known throughout the universe that I misspelled his name. I should be so lucky.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Looking for Mr. Wowbar

It turns out that my problem is not so much finding the time to see all of the shows and movies and art exhibits on my list for this fall, but finding the time to write about them. Although it doesn't show with my less than speedy reviews, I have made a real dent in my movie, theater and art exhibit list; although, for theater I have veered away from my original plan into smaller, more experimental plays, in part because someone else bought the tickets.

Part of my hesitance to write about what I have seen so far is that I'm still waiting to be wowed. I can't say that I've been thoroughly disappointed with the movies, just slightly underwhelmed. Woody Allen's latest, You Will Meet a Tall, Dark Stranger, feels like a series of vignettes about the unhappy lives of young and old married couples, but never coalesces into a graceful whole. It's a shame the characters are so despicable, because the actors playing them are superb, particularly Gemma Jones as the jilted wife of Anthony Hopkins.

Of the two "techie" movies, Catfish and The Social Network, the latter is definitely more intriguing, no matter how much the former is billed as a "mystery." I can't say that Catfish is a worthless documentary, but its revelation that online relationships can be dangerous is only new if you have been living with the Amish for the past few years. The Social Network, on the other hand, portrays Mark Zuckerburg, the creator of Facebook, as such an arrogant, brilliant asshole that it's pure pleasure to see his friends and enemies go to battle with him in a major lawsuit. Like Facebook itself, the movie is the Mark Zuckerburg show, and seeing that show once is enough. You will not be clamoring for a sequel.

I will write about the plays as soon as I've actually seen one that is on my list. As for the art exhibits, "Abstract Expressionism in New York" at MoMa is so huge that I accidentally skipped two floors and still felt like I needed to go back to fully absorb the one floor that I did see.

Clearly, I'm not done yet. There is plenty left to see and plenty of time to be wowed before the first snowflake falls in New York.



Wednesday, September 22, 2010

School Daze

For those of us who have spent most of our lives in school, either as a student or teacher, every fall is a fresh start. The people in charge of the arts in New York also seem to be on the perpetual school calendar, because New York in the fall is a burst of cultural fresh air. The 85 degree weather is throwing me off a little, but there are so many new museum shows, new plays and new movies that I want to see, that not even wearing shorts and sandals at the end of September can dampen my enthusiasm.

Here is just a partial list of the things I plan on seeing (and reviewing) this fall: Abstract Expressionist New York, at MoMa (Oct.3-April 25), The Whitney's show Modern Life:Edward Hopper and His Time (Oct.28-April10); unlike in art, this fall the theater is all about the old masters: great plays by Shakespeare, Lillian Hellman, Noel Coward, George Bernard Shaw and even a play based on Ernest Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises are either already in theaters or opening in New York in the next month. The Hemingway play is the only one that, for now, is a short train ride away in Philadelphia.

My movie list is long, and it includes Woody Allen's You Will Meet A Tall Dark Stranger, two movies about Facebook, Catfish and The Social Network, romantic comedies HeartBreaker with Vanessa Paradis (Johnny Depp's real-life paramour ) and Love and Other Drugs, a movie about viagra, starring Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne Hathaway.

I'm also going to have to see The King's Speech, with my favorite Brit, Colin Firth, who is due for an Oscar and according to film festival buzz might get one for his portrayal of a stuttering King George VI, the current Queen Elizabeth's father. Then, if I'm feeling really cynical, I might squeeze in I'm Still Here the faux documentary about Joaquin Phoenix, and Picture Me where super-skinny, super-rich models complain about how overworked and underfed they are.

How am I going to do all this in the next few months? That's a good question given that fall also means back to work for me. The papers have already started piling up. The students are already e-mailing for conferences. But it's fall and I can dream.


Friday, August 20, 2010

Will the real Slim Shady stand up?


I used to think that it was inevitable: as I got older I would become more conservative. It seems the opposite is happening. The longer I live the more I realize how my children have pushed me to become more open-minded. And I can't thank them enough.

When Eminem first became a household name my son was thirteen years old. I picked him up from camp one summer and he could recite all of the words to Eminem's "Without Me." I was appalled. Fast forward six years and I find myself defending Eminem's First Amendment rights in a Facebook discussion with a group of intelligent women who are all moms of young children. The women object to the the monster hit song " The Way You Lie."In it Eminem raps about an abusive relationship where the couple keep breaking up and getting back together. At one point the rapper threatens to tie his girlfriend to the bed and "set this house on fire" if she tries to leave again.

The chorus of "The Way You Lie" is sung by Rihanna, whose famous abuse at the hands of her ex-boyfriend Chris Brown makes her participation either very ironic or very stupid. I refuse to believe the latter. If anything, the fact that it incites controversy shows that the song may actually bring attention to the subject of abuse and afford an opportunity for parents to discuss it with their kids. Telling kids that the music is junk (or forbidden) and they shouldn't listen to it at all will send them straight to the Internet to download it. Anyway, isn't that what our parents told us about rock music in the 70's, including classics like Led Zeppelin and The Who?

If it's any consolation, my son the former Eminem fan, won't listen to Eminem anymore. "He's way too commercial now," he said recently. He will, however, listen to Beethoven and Led Zeppelin. They do grow up eventually, musically speaking, for the most part unscathed.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Holding Out for a Hero


There are very few women in popular culture these days that I would want my fifteen-year-old daughter to idolize. I know that Lady Gaga is making a statement about individuality, but does that always have to involve something see through that shows her breasts?

Fortunately, there are several young female characters running around in a book and a movie that I would call genuine role models, and perhaps even heroines. The first is a character named Ree Dolly (Jennifer Lawrence) in a film called Winter's Bone.

Visually, the movie is haunting, like a dark, rural painting where Andrew Wyeth meets Edward Hopper in the Ozarks. But more than the setting, the young girl at the center of the story is seventeen years old, responsible for her entire household, including two younger siblings and her mentally incapacitated mother, with absolutely no help from a missing, meth cooking father. Yet Ree is so determined and so capable that it's impossible for her to do anything but fight and survive. Any teenager who can teach her little brother to shoot a squirrel and cook it for supper has my vote for the MTV movie awards' "Bravest Film Chick" of the Year (new category).

The literary heroines that I want my daughter to idolize are the three women in the novel The Help, set in 1960's Jackson, Mississippi. One privileged young white woman and two black maids set out to write a book within a book describing what it is like to be "the help" in a white home in the pre-civil rights south. The three characters are very different, but all three risk everything they have for a cause they believe in. They have so much pride and determination and love of family and justice, that I would make this book a mandatory read in every tenth grade classroom across the country. And it's historical fiction so it goes down a lot smoother than a history text book.

Here's to role models for young women, real or imagined.


Friday, July 30, 2010

Send in the Clowns


I have always wondered how comedians manage to perform when they are sad. What if they are genuinely depressed and don't feel like being funny? This thought crossed my mind again last Wednesday night when I was at Comix comedy club on West 14th street listening to a lineup of stand up comedians who work on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. The man himself wasn't there, of course, but his executive producer and writer Rory Albanese was, as was one of his funniest correspondents, John Oliver.

Oliver, with his very proper-sounding British accent reminded the crowd that if this had been 250 years ago he would have been barking orders at us instead of jokes. He joked about the waning American empire, as evidenced by some of our most ridiculous TV game shows, and he had a rather long, imaginary conversation onstage with his father about deciding to tell a joke involving a certain part of his father's anatomy. There was a hint of sadness there, but only in his effort to exit the joke gracefully, which was impossible.

The surprise guest of the evening was comedian Jim Gaffigan, who has absolutely nothing to do with The Daily Show but is very, very funny. I happen to know this because my son is a big fan and has recited numerous Gaffigan jokes about food. This particular evening he went on about McDonald's and how much we love to hate the place. He pointed out that our expectations should be low when the mascot is a "pedophile clown from the 70's." If he was sad that evening it didn't show; it must help if you can make a crowd of people laugh.

I once asked author Michael Crichton if he ever wakes up and doesn't feel like writing. His response was "if I was an airline pilot, I couldn't just say I don't feel like flying today. " So I guess the best advice for comedians and writers alike is, "smile, though your heart is breaking." And go to a comedy club once in a while if you want to see how it's done.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

A LIttle Night (and Day) Music


Last Thursday I stood in line at 10:00am along 59th street near Fifth Avenue with throngs of Sting fans. I have never been a huge Sting fan and only know him for the few Police songs that are burned into my brain from college frat parties. But a friend of mine from work is a fanatic, and she needed someone to share the experience of jumping up and down, screaming and clapping on cue for his free outdoor concert taped for the Early Show on CBS. I didn't watch the show the next day, but apparently I was on television for a tenth of a second if you watched with a high powered telescope.

Mary, my friend, said that I was the perfect person to bring to this event, which I wasn't sure to take as a compliment or an insult. My brief impressions of Sting , from a very close spot near the stage, were that he still has a good voice, that despite being 58 years old he makes everyone around him look totally uncool, and that his real fans are the ones that have been singing the words to 'Roxanne' since 1978. As far as musical revelations go, there were none, other than the fact that a good back up orchestra can make even a mediocre song sound like a symphony.

On that same evening, I went to Lincoln center to meet my mother, step-father, sister and niece for dinner and dancing at the Midsummer Night Swing outdoor dance festival. Midsummer Night Swing is a unique experience that can only be described as New York at its most ridiculous and joyful. Hundreds of people come out to Damrosch Park behind the New York State Theater to dance to live music of a different genre every night for three weeks.

The night we were there it was "Disco." Donna Summer and the Bee Gees were well represented, as were a full range of ages and dance abilities. One elderly gentleman in his 80s managed to swing more dance partners around the floor than other men half his age, and the girls he danced with couldn't stop smiling. Some of the couples clearly practiced before they came, but other people just grabbed whoever was willing and made up the moves as they went along. It's free if you remain outside the inner dance area, and $17 if you want to dance closer to the live music. Most people just dance wherever they are standing, with whomever they lay eyes on.

The only one who wasn't having a blast was my 20-year-old niece. She just couldn't get into the 70's music. She left to meet some friends at a bar. My sister and I paid our tributes to Donna Summer by dancing together to "I Will Survive," and then we made our way out past the crowds and the glittering fountain to find our own drinks and shared memories.

Monday, July 12, 2010

The Kids May Be All Right, But The Movie Isn't


The Kids Are All Right
Suzanne Tenner/Focus Features
Annette Bening and Julianne Moore in “The Kids Are All Right.”

Lest anyone is under the false impression that I love every movie and every theater that I attend in New York City, I have to take a minute to write a short, negative review of "The Kids Are All Right."

The movie, which just opened on Friday to superlative reviews, has a stellar cast including Julianne Moore, Annette Bening and one of my favorite actors, Mark Ruffalo. But ironically, it is the "kids," played by Mia Wasikowska and Josh Hutcherson who really are the only thing that is right with this movie.

The story is about a lesbian couple with two teenage children, Joni age 18, and Laser, age 15. The boy --probably wishing that someone else had named him--wants to seek out the children's sperm-donor father. With the help of his sister, they find him and arrange to meet him.

The donor dad turns out to be an ultra-cool, motorcycle riding single dude named Paul, played by Ruffalo, who runs an organic restaurant and farm. For the daughter, it's love at first sight, although the son reserves judgment for a second visit. Ultimately Paul wins everyone over, including one of the moms, with his easy going charm and non-parental, laid back attitude. It makes sense that the kids want to spend more and more time with him, and he starts to become attached to them as well.

Once Paul is thrown into the mix of this nontraditional family, things gradually take a turn for the worse. The one mom, played by Annette Bening, dislikes him instantly, but she is so uptight and unpleasant it seems she dislikes everyone, including her wife, Jules. Jules played by Julianne Moore, has a very different reaction. She agrees to take on Paul's overgrown backyard as a start-up project for her new landscaping business, and is just as attracted to him as her kids are. They wind up in bed every time she comes over. It's all fun and no work for him, given that the kids are beautiful and smart and practically grown, and the affair with Jules, like everything else in his life, seems casual at first.

The movie is touted as dealing with a very cutting edge subject, gay marriage and parenthood, but the problem is that every relationship seems forced, except for the heterosexual affair. The two women don't have anything in common, and one wonders how they became a couple in the first place. The character of Paul, who is demonized in the end, is totally confused, as is the audience, as to Jules' passionate involvement with him and then subsequent rejection. Granted, he's kind of a smarmy asshole, but he doesn't deserve this.

As hard as writer/director Lisa Cholodenko tries to make this into a real family, the actresses are not able to pull off any genuine feeling between the two main characters. I really didn't care about their relationship in the end. The only thing that is pitch perfect is the behavior of the two teenagers. The fact that they reject their mothers and then their father, but need all of them desperately, is right on the money.







Saturday, July 10, 2010

Al Wants a Pound of Flesh, And He Usually Gets It

JOAN MARCUS
Al Pacino (right) plays Shylock in this Central Park production of Shakespeare's controversial play. The cast also includes Lily Rabe (left) as Portia and Byron Jennings as Antonio.

Al Pacino is not the only reason to try and see the Shakespeare in the Park version of The Merchant of Venice. He's great, but so is the entire cast, half of whom I recognized from at least one television sitcom, including Jesse Tyler Ferguson from my current favorite Modern Family.

Part of the pleasure of this production is that the language and the plot are made so accessible by the actors. They all enunciate wildly. And the production itself, thankfully, does not try to change the setting to war torn Europe or Venice 2000, or some other unnecessarily futuristic landscape. Granted it's hard to listen to the tirades against "the Jew" (Shylock) by the Christians (the rest of the characters) with a politically correct, 21st century sensibility. That is why the play is so seldom performed, which is a shame, because while it may bring into focus the accepted anti-semitism of Shakespeare's time, my interpretation is that it doesn't condone it. Shylock is too complex a character for that.

Also, Portia is one of the smartest most fully developed female characters in any play I've ever seen outside of a Wendy Wasserstein play. And Lily Rabe who plays her is the best member of the cast by far; Al was good, but a couple of times when he starts to rant I couldn't help feeling like he was doing a Jewish version of the colonel in Scent of A Woman.

One piece of advice. Bring your own snacks and drinks because the line at the snack bar at intermission is so long that only the NYC marathon runners at the front got served before the Second Act.

Friday, July 9, 2010

Does Al Pacino have eyes? Find out tomorrow!

Stay tuned for tomorrow's review of Al Pacino as Shylock in the Central Park presentation of Shakespeare's "Merchant of Venice."

And please do a reverse rain dance so that we can actually see the show tonight!!

What a Piece of Work Is (This Wo)Man


What makes people happy? Is it their children? Not according to the cover article of this week's New York Magazine, whose title is "I Love My Children. I Hate My Life." Is it their friends and family? Some studies say that's the key, and yet family also seems to be the main topic of conversation on most therapists' couches. Is it money? That's so 1980's. The sociologists doing the research may want to check out Joan Rivers' documentary. She has the answer: it's work, and in her very funny, very watchable movie she proves that she still deserves to be doing it at age 75.

There are some very moving moments in "Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work," although when Rivers tears up about having to fire her longtime manager and good friend Billy her eyes are the only thing that betray her sentiment. The rest of her face simply doesn't move. But her notorious plastic-surgery induced face, and her self-deprecation about it, makes her life or death struggle to stay in the show biz game that much more poignant in the movie.

There are numerous clips of the young Joan with Johnny Carson and others, pre-surgery. At that time she was not famous for her looks but for her cutting edge, raunchy humor and the fact that she was a woman comedian. If you didn't already know, the movie makes clear that she was a genuine pioneer for women in comedy. But God forbid you call her a "comedy icon." One poor guy does and gets a quick "I don't want to be an icon. Fuck you," in return.

In her advanced age she remains an outsider in what is still a male dominated industry and her anger fuels her comedy. She struggles to get work, except the kind that makes her the butt of the jokes. She accepts that too, for the money, but she doesn't like it. When she is cruelly roasted on Comedy Central by male comedians who are a lot younger and a lot less funny, it's a squirm inducing moment for her and for the audience. You genuinely feel sorry for her. She only half-jokingly advises the audience to "invest wisely when you're younger."

But if anyone has ever made lemonade from lemons, she has. The movie is filled with her jokes, both spontaneous and rehearsed, and they are funny. She doesn't necessarily joke about her misfortunes, and she's had big ones, including the suicide of her husband and partner Edgar. But there is never a joke far behind. She just keeps on going, like a hard, plastic version of the energizer bunny. When her adorable grandson tells her that his friend has three Play Stations and the friend gave him one, she quips "does he have a single grandfather?"

More than anything she loves being center stage, and she is the first to admit it. It makes some of the film's drama a bit suspect, given that she prides herself on being an actress rather than a comedian. But it is still refreshing, and downright inspiring, to hear her talk about how much she loves to work. When she wins "Celebrity Apprentice" and someone congratulates her she quickly retorts, "It's great but it's not an Oscar."

My guess is next March she might have to find another joke, and another gig, when she finds herself a Documentary nominee being asked what she's wearing on the red carpet, instead of doing the asking, for a change.

p.s. One of the things that makes me happy is being able to go to the movies in the afternoon when the kids are away at camp!

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Ah Bartleby! Ah Humanity!


When I saw this portrait of Beatrice Cenci by Guido Reni (1575-1642) in a museum in Rome a few weeks ago, I had no idea why the painter chose to portray this woman with such deep tragedy in her young eyes. I had never heard the story of the Cenci family, nor did I know that it was also the subject of several books, a 1969 movie and a full scale opera. What I learned when I started to look into the Cenci family history was that shocking family drama is not the exclusive domain of our current tabloid culture. Nor is unspeakable cruelty and intrigue merely the subject of the current bestseller, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo.

As promised, here is a brief synopsis of Beatrice's sordid story: Her father, Francesco Cenci, was a cruel but powerful man who physically abused his children, including Beatrice's two brothers and her step-mother. Although he had been in trouble with the papal courts and was known to be violent and immoral, he was always protected because of his wealth and status. When he went as far as sexually abusing her, Beatrice Cenci plotted to kill her father, with her brothers and step-mother in agreement. She had help from a young guard, who was also her lover. One version of the story claims that they had a child.

I read various accounts of how they did it (drugs, hammer, knife) but ultimately they killed Francesco and threw him off a balcony to make it look like an accident. Despite the sympathy of many Roman citizens, Francesco's position as a nobleman made it imperative that the murderers be punished. Pope Clement VII condemned the family to death for the murder. In 1599, at age 22, Beatrice Cenci was beheaded on a scaffold in Rome. Her brother and step-mother were also killed. Only one younger brother, age twelve, was allowed to live.

If I read this story in a novel or saw it as a play or a movie, I would have thought that it was pure fiction. But really, I should know better by now.

In every era, rich, powerful men (and women) have gotten away with abusing children or adults who they view as weaker or inferior. We have our very own Cenci stories: just ask Nancy Grace. Joran Van der Sloot thought he got away with murder in Aruba and in Peru, as did his father who sought to protect him with his powerful diplomatic influence. George Huguely, who murdered his beautiful Lacrosse-playing girlfriend, clearly didn't think at all, but somehow learned from his wealthy father that he could vent his anger and frustration with no real consequences. Even Tiger Woods, who I don't view as evil or psychotic, used his status and wealth to do things that most men and women would never dream of even trying to get away with.

If life imitates art, then in all of the above cases the perpetrators will pay an irrevocable price for their crimes. At least that's the way it goes in Hollywood and in The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. Unfortunately, it's too late for Natalee Holloway, Stephany Flores and Yeardley Love. The most we can hope for is that someone will paint their portrait and turn their lives into art.




Monday, June 28, 2010

Sex, Pharmaceuticals and Rock n'Roll

I was going to write about a haunting painting by Guido Reni (1575-1642) that I saw at the Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Antica in the Palazzo Barberini in Rome a little over a week ago. The portrait of a young woman, Beatrice Cenci, is not just sensitive and captivating but also has a story behind it that could be ripped out of the 16th century, Italian version of People magazine ("Gente"). But I'm not going to write about the painting in this post. You will just have to read my next post to get the gripping, lurid details of this story of family, aristocracy, incest, murder and betrayal.

The reason I am deferring the sensational Cenci story is that yesterday's New York Times op-ed piece by Camille Paglia entitled "No Sex Please, We're Middle Class," engendered a very interesting discussion in my household this morning. (Only adults over the age of 18 were involved in the discussion).

Paglia, a noted feminist and social commentator, argues that a female version of Viagra is not the answer to the problem of "sexual malaise" that is rampant in our country. It's not quite clear from her essay what the real problem is, because she throws in everything from gender roles to rock n' roll, but her thesis is that interest in sex is a class issue. Middle-class, working women have dulled down their sex drive by becoming too masculine and by emasculating their husbands. The two sexes, albeit in a certain income bracket, have lost the essence of femininity and masculinity. What exactly that essence consists of is not made clear by Paglia, except that it has something to do with shopping at Victoria's Secret.

I am not going to refer directly to personal experience here, except to say that there is nothing that can make a woman feel less sexy than spending twelve hours at home alone with two young kids, with barely a moment to go to the bathroom alone, let alone change out of the spit-up and water paint-laced t-shirt she managed to change into at twelve noon. After a few years of this, reading the paper on the 8am train dressed in a skirt and blouse could be more of a turn on than when Baby undresses Johnny and dances with him to the music of Solomon Burke's "Cry to Me" in Dirty Dancing.

It would make more sense that a couple that can afford to pay a babysitter, and afford to go to the movies and out to dinner one night a week, might actually be able to enjoy each other's company enough to want to have sex. However, after blaming "the white collar realm," Paglia goes on to target Hollywood and video games. Hollywood no longer produces romance with innuendo, she says, and video games turn women into skinny, large-breasted super heroines.

It may be true that Hollywood has lost the art of good writing, but romantic comedies, or, "chick-flicks" as they are currently referred to, abound. I recently saw a charming one called "Letters to Juliet," with Vanessa Redgrave. Okay, so I saw it with my fifteen-year-old, but it was still very romantic. And the vampire "Twilight" series, which has captured the hormones of young girls everywhere has more than enough innuendo, with all that neck biting, heavy petting, and serious eye gazing. I don't think it is worth even discussing any adult male or female who lets video games influence their libido.

But maybe my biggest problem with Paglia's essay is that she offers no support. Sorry, but the English composition teacher in me refuses to accept an argument without some hard core, factual support. She doesn't bother to say what percentage of women are affected by this loss of sexual enthusiasm, what age group they fall into (pre or post-menopausal)or even what their actual income bracket is. She does, however, throw in a nice throwback reference to the "white bourgeoise." Apparently, the only people who are having sex are working-class minorities and country music fans.

My biggest complaint of all is that she doesn't even bother to cite the demographics of who shops at Victoria's Secret! Last time I was there, there were plenty of white, middle class women with their little pink cards in hand. But as my daughter would say at this point, "Mom, TMI!"*


*too much information

Sunday, June 20, 2010

Arrivederci Roma

Tonight is our last night in Rome, and we decided to have a quiet, low-key dinner at the hotel. Julia, my fifteen-year old, has now been fully indoctrinated into the coffee culture of Rome and has started drinking caffe latte (with two and a half sugars). She has been a more enthusiastic gastronomic partner than I could have ever hoped for, and therefore I have decided to let her write the post on the food of Rome.

Before I turn it over to Julia, I just want to add the observation that the food, like the presence of a church, can be counted on wherever you go in this city. I can't say I have a favorite meal here, but I could probably eat the pizza at least once a day and gelato twice. And since that is basically what we have been doing, I have been able to avoid trying on any chic Italian clothing. My feet, on the other hand, I found, have not gained weight. The shoes are very, very nice here.

And now for a full food review, I turn it over to Julia:

Buona sera tutti, and I'm sad to say that it is our last night in Rome. My taste buds still tinglefrom a few of the special meals we've had here, and as my Mom's already said, I'm here to give a little overview and review.

It's Italy, and pizza can be found everywhere. Walk down any street, and you're guaranteed to find a "Ristorante Pizzeria" in every other building. Literally. These are your basic diner equivalents, and they've all got amazing thin crust, true Italian style pizza. And as a little side note, the basic "Margherita Pizza" was actually named for a queen of Italy, from right around the time of thecountry's unification in the 1800s. Pasta is everywhere, and as a person who cannot stop eating pasta once it's been made (seriously, at home I eat it out of the strainerl), I've enjoyed the surplus immensely.

Of course, if you want a real meal, with maybe a few more appealing options, any of the little bit nicer restaurants you find will offer the most amazing food. The Italians have a way of preserving the flavors in their food that for whatever reason Americans cannot seem to figure out. Any pasta dish or meat dish or caprese salad from a slightly more upscale restaurant will offer you an experience so good that even when you are stuffed to bursting, you cannot help but put just a little bit more into your mouth. A personal favorite of mine is in fact those caprese salads, and the mozzarella that you will find here (and all over Italy I'm sure) is like no other. It melts in your mouth. A little olive oil, maybe a bite of tomato, and I could live off of this stuff (with some gelato and pasta, of course, and I'll talk more about the former in a second). Oh and the bread. I am particularly partial to French bread, but those Italians know how to work their dough too. In conjunction with the flavors, the sauces they add to the juiciest cuts of meat and the most sumptuous of pastas make my mouth water just thinking of them.

This all sounds quite heavy, and trust me I think I've gained a few pounds eating all of this food, but lighter meals are not lacking in these incredible flavors. We went to one place in the old Jewish ghetto where they served us two platters of salads and raw meat and lighter vegetables with bread. One thing that stands out was the white fish; I don't know how they did it, but it was possibly one of the most delectable things I've ever tasted. Flavors! YUM.

So of course, after your meal, you need something sweet to end the evening (or afternoon, or morning even, if you're not too conservative). Gelaterias are nearly as common as the Pizzerias, and although they're all unique, any single one will give you a nice little treat.
Buon appetito!

Friday, June 18, 2010

Roma


Buona sera from Rome. As I sit at my computer in the lobby of my hotel in Rome at 12:30 am, the sounds from the street are distinct. The night sounds here are different from those in New York. I can hear the sound of cups clinking at the cafe across the street, where a long table of people are still sitting and enjoying their last sips of espresso and smoking cigarettes. There is traffic whizzing by, but it is mostly motorcycles, and the car noises are distinctly those of a manual transmission. And of course, when voices drift in through the open door, they are speaking in a loud but mellifluous language that is foreign to me.

I thought that once I got to Rome I would be so overwhelmed I would want to post here every day. Well, I am overwhelmed, and maybe that's why this is my first post in three days. What my fifteen-year old daughter said about St. Peter's Basilica today applies to my feelings about Rome in general: it's 'ginormous.' Some things are just too big and too important to use either gigantic or enormous alone.

It's not just the physical size of the structures we have seen so far, like the Colosseum or the Vatican Museums or the collection at the Galleria Borghese, that make Rome seem so much bigger than ordinary life. It is also the quantity and the quality of the art and architecture that was created here. Yesterday we saw Bernini's incredible sculpture of Apollo and Daphne at the Borghese; today we sat at a cafe in the Piazza Navona eating gelato with Bernini's fountain, 'Fontana dei Quattro Fiumi,' just a few steps away. We may have craned our necks and been unable to close our mouths along with the throngs at the Sistine Chapel today, but yesterday we traipsed around the Campidoglio which Michelangelo designed as if we were walking around Central Park.

In New York you can see great artists in the top museums, but here these artists are in the city itself. They are the city itself. And it is a hit parade for fans of art and of history: Caravaggio and Raphael, Julius Ceaser and Julius II; Constantine and Canova, among many, many others. And that is just the 'ginormity' of what we are seeing with our eyes. Then there's the food.

But there are only a few cars going by now and the cafe has shut down for the night. So I will have to save the food, and Rome's seduction of my other four senses, for the next post. So for tonight, 'Vado a Dormire!'

Monday, June 14, 2010

Words, Words, Words

There's poignancy in silence. This is not meant to be an excuse for my lack of postings in the last several days, but it is something that I have been thinking about a lot recently. It started about a week ago when I saw a French film called "Mademoiselle Chambon." I read a review of the movie in The Daily News that intrigued me. The review said that although the film was, bien sur, a romantic triangle, it did not have the heavy dose of 'sex and cigarettes' that one normally goes to French cinema to see. I know that even the French are not allowed to smoke at bars anymore, but some cinematic traditions are sacred. Just because they can't smoke in bed afterwards, doesn't mean they should dispense with the act itself. As it turns out, the film includes tremendous passion and even some sex, but the sex is almost an afterthought and, perhaps in a first for French cinema, arguably expendable.

The story of the film is simple: a working class, married father falls in love with his son's school teacher. She is single, lives alone and is also an accomplished classical violinist. That is pretty much it, except that the two main characters portray such depth of agony and emotion with so few words that the film is practically a silent movie. When they do talk to one another, they treat words as if they are precious and extremely powerful. You can imagine then, that a lot goes unsaid, but everything registers on the faces of the actors. You might feel cheated at the end, if what you like in a movie is confrontation and resolution. Everything doesn't tie up into a neat little package punctuated by a lot of "I love yous." But that's what we have Disney, or rather Pixar, for. Thank God I can still go to the Lincoln Plaza Cinema on the West side and leave feeling totally up in the air.

Shortly after I saw this film, I learned that my father has an illness in which he is slowly losing his ability to recall words and complete sentences. Our family has known that he is suffering with loss of language ability for quite some time. We are all heartbroken; particularly for someone as articulate and intellectually lively as my father this is a devastating diagnosis.

But I have just as strong a belief in the power of non-verbal communication as I do in the power of words. A person can express a lot with just a turning away of the head. If Mademoiselle Chambon gives its audience anything it's that we should value words as a gift and use them a lot more sparingly. We take them way too much for granted as it is.

Monday, June 7, 2010

The Literary World Cup

Just a short follow-up to my previous blog from May 24 about the Nigerian author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and her book of short stories, "The Thing Around Your Neck." If you happen to read The New Yorker, or even if you don't, but you want to sound very literary while watching Nigeria play Argentina in the second group of the World Cup, you can mention that Adiche was just named to the prestigious list of "20 under 40" promising young fiction writers in the June 7 issue of The New Yorker.

In case your friends haven't thrown chips at you yet because they just missed Argentina score with a header at the end of the first half, you can add that the last time the New Yorker published the list was ten years ago, in 1999. That list included writers such as Junot Diaz, who went on to win the Pulitzer prize in fiction for The Brief, Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao.

Once the second half starts and your friends ask you why you are discussing literature during an extremely important sporting event, and why it can't wait until after the game and the three beers, you can eloquently point out that a young writer from Nigeria being chosen for the "20 under 40" list is the equivalent of scoring the tying goal in the second half. She may not win the whole game, but she just got herself in a damn good position to try.

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Our Town

There are two things that can make Manhattan feel like a small town: the first is when there is a huge snowstorm--school is cancelled, not a car moves down the street and you look out the window and inevitably there is one guy with a knapsack cross-country skiing down Second Avenue. The other is when there is an Avenue street fair.

The avenue street fair is a Manhattan tradition which I would like to compare to a country fair, except that it is nothing at all like a country fair, except for the grilled corn. The "Avenue," which is hosting the fair, is closed to traffic for about twenty blocks; vendors of every ethnic background materialize with their white stands selling, among other things, Persian rugs, Peruvian embroidered kids' clothing, French perfume (well, it does say "Coco" on the bottle), African print skirts and South African world cup jerseys--okay, that particular vendor only shows up once every four years. And, oh, the smells: the chicken, beef and onion shish kebabs on the grill; the sizzling of the deep fried zeppole dough before it is rolled in sugar; the spicy pan fried Thai noodles with peanut sauce.

I wasn't thinking about a street fair when I looked out the kitchen window onto Third avenue this morning. Since on Father's Day this year I will be closer to "the Father" in Rome than "my father" in New Jersey, I invited my dad and assorted relatives to my apartment for an early celebration. This is the first Father's Day in fifteen years that will not be celebrated at our former home in the suburbs with a gourmet barbecue and a game of one on one soccer between my step-brother and one of the kids. Despite my worries that it wouldn't live up, the bagels and lox and chocolate babka were great, as was the company. As it turns out, there was still a barbecue, but it was only the smoke that came wafting up to my seventh floor window.

As soon as the last guest was out the door, so was I. Downstairs and onto Third Avenue for my small town, hometown, warm weather street fair. The kebabs were still smoking, the rain hadn't started yet and there was still plenty of grilled corn and fresh squeezed lemonade for the crowd that was leisurely walking down the middle of a city street.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Divine Providence

It has taken a few days to digest all of the things that happened when I went spent Friday and part of Saturday of the Memorial Day weekend at the Princeton reunion, and then Saturday night and Sunday morning at my own 25th reunion at Brown University. I predicted sentimentality, and if I had to put a theme song to the part of my own reunion that I attended, it would have to be Green Day's "Good Riddance", even if they do play it at every Bar Mitzvah and on the last day of camp. It truly reminded me that college was "the time of my life."

Probably the highlight of the whole weekend was reuniting with my best friend from Brown on the three and a half hour train ride from Princeton to Providence (reuniting being a euphemism for talking nonstop the entire way, including on the two trains we had to take to get to Amtrak at Penn Station in New York.)

There are some friends who we have not spoken to in five or ten or even twenty years, but it doesn't matter because when we see them again it's as if we've been checking in with them every day since our freshman year in college. We suddenly remember why this person meant so much to us, yet there's a surreal quality to the encounter given that they show up (in some cases) with their 6'2'' teenage son.

My own son (only 5'8", but still) just finished his freshman year at Brown. He came along, allegedly to visit his upper class friends who were graduating, but I think he just wanted to make sure that his mother didn't party like it was 1999. Just in case the reunion committee was serious about recreating an 80s style college "funk night" with the requisite kegs, smell of beer and vomit in the hallway afterwards, I had two glasses of Proseco at the hotel before I left. Luckily we have all grown up to appreciate an open bar (and to be able to pay for it).

Even though I had the usual 'shouting match over the music' five minute conversations with most of the classmates I spoke to, I still managed to have substantive talks with two different college friends, both of whom I never see. That meant a lot to me. Also, Princeton may have the "P-rade" with its loud, outlandish orange and black costumes, but there is nothing like the Brown tradition of marching down college hill with your classmates, and then lining the hill to watch the current class of graduates march. It never fails to give me chills, despite the 85 degree weather.

Walking back up the hill, past the college and on to the main drag of Thayer street, my son said that he would prefer to have just a week off for summer and then come back to school. That, even more than the reunion itself, is how I know just how much time has passed.

Friday, May 28, 2010

Reunion Weekend

This weekend is my 25th college reunion, a fact which should make me feel really old. But it doesn't. I've already dealt with a child going off to college, with my students being as old as my son, and a few years ago a student figured out that his dad and I graduated high school together. So this milestone comes as no shock. Since I have so far this weekend only attended my husband's reunion (I'm heading to mine this afternoon) I will only make a few short observations:

This is Princeton, and in case you needed to be reminded, you need only look at the breakfast table next to yours to see grown men who usually wouldn't leave the house in anything but a white shirt and a blue blazer, wearing orange and black jackets with tiger heads swimming in patterns that will make the most avid trick or treater's head spin. If you can walk, and that means even with two people assisting you, you show up here for your 60th and even 70th reunion.The parties are open to all classes, therefore you will be waiting in a long, long line for beer along with the current crop of Princeton seniors. Oh, and don't try to make a left turn on Route 1 in South Brunswick, New Jersey, because a cop who definitely did not attend Princeton will not be particularly sympathetic of the fact that you don't know your way around here and have never heard of a "jug handle."

I am off to my alma mater this afternoon, along with my best friend from college who happens to have also married a Princetonian, so I will definitely be more sentimental on Monday.

Monday, May 24, 2010

"The Thing Around Your Neck"

One of the perks of being a former book reviewer for a Gannett newspaper is that the publicists for various publishing houses continue to send you copies of books that they are hoping you will, in one form or another, write about (who knows, perhaps even blog about).

Although I no longer write about books professionally, I still talk about them a lot in my classroom at NYU, particularly the ones that are well written and that, in one way or another, relate to topics that fall under the obscure heading of "American Cultural Mythology," the subject matter of my second semester writing course.

So, how does a book of short stories about the struggles of Nigerians immigrating to the United States, or living in current day Nigeria, fit in? "The Thing Around Your Neck," by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, fits in because the "thing" is not a thing at all, it is a feeling of loneliness and isolation that happens when you are a stranger anywhere, at any time, in your own country. A line like, "You wanted to write that rich Americans were thin and poor Americans were fat," says more about our culture, and more about writing, than ten introductions to ten different text books.

And if you want to appreciate just how different our lives are, yet how utterly the same, from most of the rest of the world's population then I recommend reading this book, that came to me through the strange workings of the publishing universe.

Frank McCourt, my much beloved high school writing teacher used to say, referring to our student pieces, " A piece of writing should nourish you. With this writing I will die of malnourishment of the soul." This book will keep you well fed.

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Home from College

I have to say one thing about having my son, my first born, home from college for a day and a half: I love it and his room is already a mess. That's two things.

It's not that I am constantly unhappy when he is away at school. I know that he loves college and he is utterly enthusiastic every time I speak with him, or rather text with him, which he claims is every day. Or at least it feels that way to him. But the only way I can describe what it is like to be without him, after eighteen years of having him in my home and in my heart, is to refer to what it must be like to lose a limb. Sorry to be rather gross, but it's the best analogy I can come up with.

When he first went to school last fall, I was constantly aware of his absence. Like a phantom presence, I set the dinner table for four even though we were only three. I referred to South Park way more times than would be normal for a woman my age. I thought of jokes that he would make, especially when I did something that deserved to be laughed at. As time went by, I started to get used to it, as if having only one child at home was the norm. But sometimes I would feel despondent, without really having a reason to be.

Now that he is home, it seems so obvious to me what was missing. I can almost guarantee that within a week I'll be getting on his nerves. He has, after all, not been told to do his own dishes since Christmas break. And within a week his habit of leaving his dirty laundry, mixed with the clean, on the floor of his room will be driving me crazy. But his uncanny ability to make me laugh, his ever evolving intellect, his "chill" attitude and his capacity for watching four straight hours of ESPN Sports Center make me feel whole again. At least until he leaves for a summer job in California in three weeks, I have all my limbs in place.

Sunday in the City With Otto

I have lived in the city full time for over a year now, but I still get a thrill from the fact that I live ten minutes from some of the planet's greatest works of art. Gustav Klimt's "Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer" (1907) was one half of the focus of a private tour I took today, along with my daughter and another family, at the Neue Galerie on 86th street and Fifth Avenue. My friend won the tour as part of a fundraiser for her synagogue, which has an irony all its own, given the provenance of the painting.

The painting was left behind by its original Viennese owner (and widow of Adele), Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer, whose townhouse was annexed by the Nazis and turned into a rail station for transporting Jews to concentration camps. The painting (surprise surprise) wound up the property of the Austrian government and was displayed in the Belvedere museum in Vienna until 2006 when the 86 year-old niece of the Bloch-Bauers won her groundbreaking lawsuit to return the stolen art to its rightful, surviving heir. The story ends with the heroic (and very rich) Ronald Lauder, who helped finance the lawsuit, buying the painting for a record $135 million and placing it, like the Mona Lisa, at the heart of his own townhouse museum dedicated to Austrian and German art.

You could say I have waited my whole life to have this painting in my backyard. As a child spending every other summer visiting my mother's friends and relatives in Vienna, I first fell in love with the shiny work of Klimt, particularly "The Kiss," in its original, but not proper, home. So having this spectacular portrait, with all of its intricate gold inlay and the delicate, painted white skin and black hair of Adele practically to myself today, I felt inordinately lucky and grateful. Adele looked pretty satisfied with the situation herself, but that may be because she was, according to our docent, having an affair with the artist.

The second half of the tour was devoted to the current show of work by the German artist Otto Dix (1891-1969). In terms of aesthetics, the two could not be further apart. The Dix exhibit is the reason the museum has an ongoing, strict "no children under 12" policy. His gruesome etchings of World War I scenes and graphic depictions of the depravity of German society during the Weimar Republic are grotesque and utterly compelling at the same time. He was a master watercolorist, and we are not talking your Impressionist watercolors here. As my good friend so eloquently put it, "What's with all the prostitutes?"

And of course, the final and real reason most people visit the museum: Cafe Sabarsky. Forget the opportunity to expand the cultural knowledge of German Expressionism, and relish the opportunity to expand the waistband by ordering the Hungarian goulash with spaetzle, a glass of red wine and the Topfentorte or the Sacher torte mit schlag for dessert.

God Bless You, Ronald Lauder.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Time and Desire

I have been thinking lately about how quickly time passes and how little we do to take that fact seriously and go after our heart's desire while there is still time.

When I was living in the suburbs, I kept thinking that some external factor would come along that would force us to move back to the city. A terrorist attack in the White Plains Mall? A pandemic of mosquito driven bird fever that was only transmitted by suburban mosquitos? I remember reading an article about a family from Pennsylvania whose daughter was an aspiring actress and the whole family had to move to the city to allow her to pursue her ambition to attend a child's acting academy. My daughter played the flute, but she had a great music program at her local middle school (darn it)., and she wasn't quite Julliard material...yet.

So, when I finally did make it clear that I wanted to move back to the city and was no longer willing to wait until my street got hit by a twister, all hell broke loose. My husband, daughter and son joined forces against me. This was their home town, this was where their friends lived (as if no other friends were possible anywhere else) and the city was a dirty, noisy place that is nice to visit but not for more than three or four hours at a time.

But the truth is that by the time I actually expressed what I wanted I was strong enough to meet any opposition head on. I even threatened to buy an apartment no matter what. I had lived in the 'burbs for sixteen years and it wasn't working for me anymore. I knew what I wanted and I wasn't willing to compromise. I felt as though I had done my compromising for the previous sixteen years. And so often mothers (and fathers, too) feel like they are bad people when they express their desires for change. To quote the LIon King (Disney at its most Shakespearian), "oh yes, change is difficult" ( as Rafiki hits Simba over the head to knock some sense into him).

In the end, I got my wish, but only because I refused to give in to the guilt and the pressure to change my mind. And the hardest part was suffering through my daughter's utter unhappiness (which lasted a year). All of this I bore, and not easily,in order to be surrounded by the noise and the traffic and the bustle and the people that make me feel alive. Even my daughter now likes the freedom of going to see a Broadway show with her friend, and not needing a ride there or back.

I was never one to speak up about my own desires, because as a wife and a mother it is seemed selfish. And maybe it was selfish. But it was a step in fighting for my own happiness. Just one step at a time.

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Mother's Day at the New York Botanical Gardens

So here is the odd thing about this year's Mother's Day. I didn't spend it in the city , even though or perhaps because I live here now. When I lived in the suburbs, Mother's Day was the one day per year that it was absolutely guaranteed that I would spend the day in the city. Since it was my day, and I got to choose what we were going to do, no child or spouse was allowed to whine and complain about how he or she didn't want to go to the museum, or go to a play or go for brunch in the city. All other weekends Sunday could be up for debate (too much to do in the house, kids want to go to the playground, kids have too much homework (later), kids have plans with their friends and need a ride(even later), kids want to drive to rock band practice (much later)). But not on Mother's Day.

So, imagine my surprise at the fact that I spent Mother's Day this year at the New York Botanical Gardens in the Bronx (www.nybg.org) and actually enjoyed it. When my children were small we would go to the Botanical Gardens several times per year, usually at the urging of my husband who needs long walks the way I need to see at least some buildings over ten stories to feel fully alive. My reaction was usually the same: this is nice but aren't we surrounded by enough nature in Westchester? Also, the kids were mainly interested in running through the shrubbery maze that now resides in the Everett Children's garden, and they had to be forcibly removed after twenty minutes of making themselves dizzy.

But the Botanical Gardens happen to be a very special place, and the current exhibit of "Emily Dickinson's Garden:The Poetry of Flowers" (through June 13)is a unique and spectacular recreation of flowers that Dickinson both cultivated in nature and in her poetry. The colors alone could rival any retrospective of the Fauves at the Modern Museum of Art. And now that my daughter has grown up sized legs,the distances don't seem quite so large to get back to the parking lot.

I had no regrets, however, returning to a sushi dinner in Manhattan save for one: that we had no reason to visit the maze in the children's garden.

Movie Night

This weekend I saw two movies, "Hot Tub Time Machine," and "Iron Man 2." Neither of these movies represents my general taste in cinema which leans towards romantic chic flicks and intense drama with the occasional foreign film thrown in. I've always been an avid follower of movie reviews (sometimes I like the reviews better than the movies) so I usually have an idea of what's playing that is actually good. When my children were small I would pass movie theaters and glance longingly at the marquee like a prison inmate dreaming of a chinese banquet. Movie night was restricted to the weekend evenings when and if we had a babysitter, and then there was the difficult choice of movie versus dinner out because the movie times never seemed to allow for both. The alternative, as the kids got older was movies appropriate for them which nine times out of ten turned out to be among the ten worst films ever made (who can forget "The Scooby Doo" movie or "The Pokemon" movie. I have tried, believe me.)

Well, after this weekend here is what I have concluded about being a parent of young children and movies: you don't have waste time feeling like you are missing something. There are so few really good movies being made, that it is barely worth the cost of a babysitter plus the movie tickets when staying home and watching "Love Actually" for the tenth time will feel like a more satisfying cinematic experience. Granted, there is one really good line in "Hot Tub Time Machine" about the way teenagers in the 80's actually connected (hint:not on Facebook) and John Cusack is so heartbreakingly sincere that you feel like he stepped into the wrong movie. But other than those two minor elements, the movie is a crude, less imaginative frat boy version of "Back to the Future."

As for "Iron Man 2" well, that's a movie whose action scenes brought back not so fond memories of my son's Power Rangers toys and if it wasn't so long and droll would capture the heart of every nine-year-old boy. Two of my friends fell asleep during the movie. Of course, there is Robert Downey, Jr. who is such a good actor that he is capable of making even a comic book hero into a psychologically complex, despicable yet irresistible character.

I see a lot more movies now that my kids are older and I live in the city, but I still don't see a lot of good movies. In that respect the suburbs and the city are the same.

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Group Class and Dance Party

So tonight I attended the weekly Friday night dance party at the studio where I take lessons. Almost every dance studio has a party on Friday nights where you can go and try out some of the dances you are learning in lessons as if you were at a Bar Mitzvah or a wedding or, if you're very brave, a Latin dance club. Of course, there are teachers there to dance with the students, and to dance with one another (which really makes you feel like you are just not born of the same genetic material as these lithe creatures.)

What's nice is that you can go with your husband or significant other (if you want to have a built in partner), or you can go alone and you will still dance with a partner, whether it's a teacher or some random dude who just showed up to hold hands. Seriously though these are all people who want to dance and some even know how. The only problem I can see with these parties is that the only beverage served is water. This is not conducive to helping you let loose and feel less inhibited about shaking your booty in front of a bunch of complete strangers.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Information for Moms Who Want to Dance 1x per week

If you like the description of the dance lessons, or you just want to get out of the house once a week and wear a pair of heels for forty-five minutes, then try to take a free ballroom dancing lesson either in the suburbs, or even better, at a studio in the city. The studio I go to, "Dance With Me SoHo," is in a great location for shopping or going out to eat after the lesson, if you can make a whole afternoon of it.

The address is 466 Broome Street (corner of Greene) and you can get there from Grand Central by taking the 6 train to Spring Street, walking one block south to Broome and then a few blocks west to Greene.

When my kids were very little I took a continuing ed class at NYU once a week, and it made me feel like a real person again, just being among grown ups and having some writing assignments that required me to go to a movie and to see a play. It was a pain to get there and I had to hire a babysitter for that evening every week, but it was very worth the change in routine. The dancing could serve the same purpose, and you are exercising at the same time.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Shall We Dance?

You know all of those lists of things that you are supposed to do before you die? Well, I'll never do the majority of those things (or see the majority of those things that are listed under things to see before you die) but I am doing one thing that has always been on my list and i don't need to go to Egypt to do it (just SoHo): I'm taking ballroom dancing lessons. I started taking lessons in March, and I have progressed to the point where I can actually have a conversation with my instructor (my very, very young instructor) and do the rumba at the same time. A few weeks ago that would have been impossible as it's hard to talk when you are counting out loud and looking at your feet.

My instructor has infinite patience and the body of a ballet dancer, and for forty-five minutes a week he acts as if there is nowhere else he would rather be than across from a middle-aged mother of two who can recite most of Baby and Johnny's lines from "Dirty Dancing" by heart. During my lesson this week my instructor, N., informed me that "God gave you knees for a reason." Apparently I never learned the lesson so often repeated by my Austrian mother on the slopes of the Catskills: "bend zee knees!" Also, apparently breathing is helpful when dancing, as I am reminded by N to "breathe through the steps." The last time someone reminded me to breathe was during childbirth, and the cascade of four letter words ensured that he would not remind me again; I would have to remember on my own.

The best part of the lesson this week was practicing the "corte" in the Tango. The corte is when the man and the woman stop and "strike a pose" with the woman's body in the shape of an arc formed by extending one leg forward and lowering into the knees while bending the body backwards. The tango is all together the most sensually charged dance, since it is all about wanting and then being rebuked and then wanting again and being rebuked again, but continuing to dance nonetheless. And that's why an English teacher loves dancing. It's all about the metaphors.

I